Miller v. Rhodius

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Carl Miller against H. U. Rhodius seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Miller when he was struck by an automobile driven by Rhodius.

The trial was to a jury and resulted in a directed verdict for the defendant, Rhodi-us. Carl Miller has prosecuted this appeal.

The appeal presents three main questions; first, Was the evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to the negligence of appellee, Rhodius? second, Was Carl Miller guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law? third, Was the evidence sufficient to go to the…