Legal Opinion

Krivitsky v. Town of Westerly

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 10, 2004No. 2003-509-AppealPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The propriety of a Superior Court writ of mandamus — one that required a municipality to issue a license for the operation of a helicopter-ride business in that town — is the issue that gives us a whirl on this appeal. The defendant, the Town of Westerly (town), appeals from the granting of this writ of mandamus. The writ directed the town clerk to issue a class III amusement license to the plaintiff, Don Krivitsky d/b/a Coastline Copters (Coastline), so that Coastline could provide helicopter rides to the public in the town’s Misquamicut Beach area. We ordered the parties to show…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martone v. Johnston School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  2. Gara Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Mall at Coventry Joint Venture v. McLeodSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. New England Development, LLC v. BergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. New Harbor Village, LLC v. Town of New Shoreham Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  3. Muschiano v. TraversSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Chariho Regional School District v. GistSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  5. Chariho Regional School District v. Deborah Gist, in her capacity as the Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education of the State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API