State ex rel. Bell v. Cambridge Bd. of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fer Curiam.
Appellants’ basic contention is that R. C. 3311.24, the controlling statute herein, vests discretionary authority in the Cambridge board of education, rather than a mandatory duty, to adopt a resolution transferring the territory in question.
It is clear that R. O. 3311.24 requires the board of education in which the territory is located to transfer the territory upon approval by the State Board of Education. The statute mandates that the “ * * * State Board of Education shall either approve or disapprove a proposed transfer of territory filed with it # * * and shall notify, in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Rossford Exempted Village School District v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Garfield Heights City School District v. State Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re Transfer of Territory From the Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Garfield Heights City School District v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995