Bell v. Duesing
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
It is the first claim of the defendants that the jury did not make a proper apportionment of the negligence. They contend that the negligence of the minor plaintiff was at least as great as that of the defendant as a matter of law and that the complaint should therefore be dismissed. In the alternative they contend that this court should grant a new trial because of the improper apportionment of negligence.
This court has stated that there may be cases where the circumstances are such that a court can properly rule as a matter of law that the negligence of one of the parties involved is equal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Schmidt v. LearyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Brice v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Montalto v. Fond Du Lac CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hanson v. BinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Pruss v. StrubeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Lagerstrom v. Myrtle Werth Hospital-Mayo Health SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.