Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Fisher v. Heritage National Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 2006No. 101,701PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
{1 Managed Care Administrators, Inc. (MCA), appeals the trial court's order denying its proof of claim against the State of Oklahoma ex rel. Carroll Fisher, Insurance Commissioner (the Commissioner or Receiver), as receiver for Heritage National Insurance Company (Heritage). Based on the record and law, we affirm.
*817FACTS
12 MCA and Heritage are separate but related companies. Heritage is a health care insurance company; MCA processes claims made by Heritage's insureds. Under an agreement between the two companies, MCA receives six percent of Heritage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ferguson v. Ferguson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thornton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- STATE ex rel. DOAK v. RED ROCK INSURANCE CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- HAYES v. NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Cowboy Athletics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2012