Legal Opinion
Siggers-El v. Barlow
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 10, 2006No. 01-72729PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR AND/OR NEW TRIAL [DE 75], GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COSTS [DE 74], AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES [DE 73]
TARNOW, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On July 24, 2001, Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint in this Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendant retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights. On January 24, 2003, the Court issued an order appointing the Clinical Law Program from the University of Michigan Law School to represent Plaintiff.
On September 12, 2003, the Court denied Defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kevin King v. Chuck ZamiaraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Boesing v. SpiessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Murphy v. GilmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Ford v. BenderDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Bradley v. McFaddenDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.