Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Gilman
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 24, 2008No. 03-145, 04-103PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [DE 316/156], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL [DE 319/159]; AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT [DE 352/192]
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
Before the Court are three Motions: Defendants’ motion for judgment as a mat ter of law [DE 316 in Case No. 03-145/DE 156 in Case No. 04-103]; Plaintiffs motion for a new trial [DE 319/159]; and Defendants’ motion to stay enforcement of judgment [DE 352/192]. 1
Hearings were held on the motions for judgment as a matter of law and for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blair ex rel. Estate of Blair v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Plair v. Macomb, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Victor v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025