Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. Nelson
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 24, 1972No. 72-1049PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants, national and state banks and a bankers’ association, challenge that part of New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, Chapter 390:13 which prohibits any bank from advertising or circularizing the fact that it is authorized to act as an executor. The national banks and the association rely principally on the ground that the New Hampshire statute is repugnant to 12 U.S.C. § 92a, which authorizes national banks to act as executors under certain circumstances. Additionally, all of the appellants assert due process and equal protection claims. We affirm on the basis of the thoughtful…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank in Plant City v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- First Nat. Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin Square v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- New Hampshire Bankers Association v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Louis County National Bank v. Mercantile Trust Company National Association and James E. Smith, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- North Dakota v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1979
- New Hampshire Bankers Association v. James W. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972