Sherman v. Kruse

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 JANET SHELLMAN SHERMAN, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00408-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 DETECTIVE RAYMOND HARVEY et 14 al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 18 No. 91. Plaintiff did not respond to Defendants’ motion.1 Instead, Plaintiff submitted a number 19 of filings to the docket in what appears to be a multipart attempt to amend her complaint. These 20 have been variously captioned as a “[Fourth Amended]…