Legal Opinion

Ex parte Baer

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 11, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 11087PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

The issues here arise in a habeas corpus proceeding. The writ was allowed. The petitioners were brought before the Court. Evidence was adduced. Oral arguments were heard and written briefs were filed. It is now the duty of the court either to sustain or quash the writ.

At the September Term of the Hudson County Grand Jury, in the year 1942, a conspiracy indictment was handed down, charging these four petitioners with having bribed three public officials of the City of Bayonne in the purchase of certain motor equipment. Shortly thereafter these petitioners, fully protected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
Gordon v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
In Re BaerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
Pennsylvania ex rel. Billman v. BurkeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In re BaerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948