Legal Opinion
Argianas v. Chestler
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 31, 1994No. 1-92-3486PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE MURRAY
delivered the opinion of the court:
Thomas Argianas (Argianas), filed a verified complaint for dissolution of the partnership known as the V-31 account. Argianas asserted that a two-page handwritten document dated January 20, 1989, attached to the complaint, was a partnership agreement, which gave him a partnership interest in the V-31 account. Defendant, Joel Chestler (Chestler), filed a verified answer and counterclaim. Defendant’s answer denied the material allegations of the complaint insofar as the plaintiff contended that the exhibit attached to the complaint was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Jackson v. PelleranoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Borys v. RuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Hoem v. ZiaIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Seidmon v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wade v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State Farm General Insurance v. Best in the West Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- nClosures Inc. v. Block and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- In Re Estate of GoldsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.