Legal Opinion

in Re: Rudolph Automotive, LLC D/B/A Rudolph Mazda and Rudolph Chevrolet, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided December 30, 2020No. 08-18-00149-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS IN RE: RUDOLPH AUTOMOTIVE, § LLC D/B/A RUDOLPH MAZDA and No. 08-18-00149-CV RUDOLPH CHEVROLET, LLC, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relators. § IN MANDAMUS § § § DISSENTING OPINION Who loses when a trial court grants a motion for new trial after a three-week trial? Well, the party that prevailed, or partially prevailed certainly does. But so do the twelve jurors who took three weeks out of their life to hear and decide an important dispute. Other litigants that could have used that three weeks to have their cases heard are also the losers, as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. in Re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Viscount Properties II, L.P., D/B/A Hoy Fox toyota/lexusTexas Supreme Court · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API