Legal Opinion

Datka v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Miss Datka was prosecuted under sec. 351.05, Stats., for fornication on March 25, 1951, with Ervin Diefen-bach, who was then a married man. His age at that time was thirty-two and hers was nineteen. Up to the time the state rested, its witnesses were Lorraine, wife of Mr. Diefen-bach on the date of the offense but divorced from him at the time of trial, and the complainant, a police officer named Rasmussen. The information and warrant were not issued until seventeen months after the offense. Trial was to the court. Mrs. Diefenbach testified that her husband had not been home for several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CavettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Zingler v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Simos v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Sikora v. District Ct. of 13th Jud. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Sikora v. District Ct. of 13th Jud. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API