Legal Opinion

Sol-O-Lite Laminating Corp. v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff, Sol-o-lite Laminating Corp., brought this action against the defendant Allen for $7,787.25 which it claims is the balance due on the reasonable value of goods sold by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant counterclaimed for $26,825.51 damages for breach of implied warranty. The two issues were submitted to a jury which returned a verdict of $1,000 for plaintiff. Prom the entry of this verdict, plaintiff appeals.

The evidence, which will be viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, indicates plaintiff ivas in the business of supplying wholesalers with various items of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Kelley Et Ux. v. Mallory Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. CROSS ET UX v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GogerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API