Blume v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Intervenors Keith and Lisa Blume appeal the juvenile court’s entry of agreed orders finding the children in this action dependent under RCW 13.34.030(5)(c). They claim that the children do not meet the statutory definition of dependency because the Blumes are the children’s legal custodians, capable of caring for them. They farther claim that the court erred in entering agreed orders of dependency over their objection as parties to the action. Because the Blumes did not have final custody of the children as contemplated by RCW 13.34.030(5)(c), we hold that the children are dependent under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CarverWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Schwebke v. Lutheran Social ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Sheets v. Benevolent & Protective OrderWashington Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Dependency of JWHWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FairfaxWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Department of Social & Health Services v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Dependency of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Blume v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.