Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tenet Health System Medical, Inc. v. Roberts

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 10, 2006No. 2040679Published

1ConcurrencePittman, Judge

The provision of the settlement agreement stating that Roberts was to receive $427 per week “as long as [Roberts was] permanently and totally disabled” was, in effect, merely declaratory of the employer’s right to reopen conferred by Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-57(a)(4)b. Under Ex parte Kimberly-Clark Corp., 779 So.2d 178 (Ala. 2000), a trial court’s retention of jurisdiction to modify any award of permanent-disability compensation under the Act, other than to modify a permanent-total-disability award on a petition of the employer under § 25-5-57(a)(4)b., is improper. Moreover, the main opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mike Makemson Logging v. ColburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Kimberly-Clark CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API