Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elvis E. Johnson v. Robert Sawyer, United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1992No. 91-2763Published

1DissentGarwood, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

In my view, Johnson has established neither a cause of action under Texas law, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA),1 nor that he suffered any material damage as a result of any violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6103 as construed in Lampert v. United States, 854 F.2d 335, 338 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1034, 109 S.Ct. 1931, 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989) and William E. Schrambling Accountancy Co. v. United States, 937 F.2d 1485, 1488-89 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 956, 117 L.Ed.2d 123 (1992), a construction which the majority accepts,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API