Legal Opinion

Frink v. Hoke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Polk : Henry H. Hewitt, Judge. Suit commenced originally by William S. Frink against John Thomas for certain equitable relief, which is fully stated in the opinion. Both parties having died, Jane Frink and others were substituted for plaintiff, and B. F. Hoke and others for defendant. There was a decree for plaintiffs, and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton

This is a suit to cancel and annul a contract for the sale of real property, made and entered into between W. S. Frink and John Thomas, to have Thomas declared a trustee of the legal title to the northeast i of section 3, township 9 south, range 6 west of the Willamette Meridian, containing one hundred and sixty acres, being a portion of the land contracted to be conveyed; and for an accounting of rents and profits. Both parties having died since suit was instituted, plaintiffs were substituted for Frink, and B. F. Hoke, administrator, et al., for defendant. The facts, about which there is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Warren v. Van BruntSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Clark v. BayleyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Bush v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karrell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Richards v. Page Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pendleton School Dist. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Holloway v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Castor v. DufurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API