Legal Opinion

Kolosoff v. Turri

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1947No. 29894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

The judgment in this case was reversed. Kolosoff v. Turri, 25 Wn. (2d) 452, 171 P. (2d) 234. A rehearing was granted, and the cause was argued to the court sitting En Banc.

The majority of the court has arrived at a conclusion different from that of the Department. Although the facts are set out in the opinion, it is proper to note that respondent testified that his information relative to the completion of the policy of title insurance was not given to him until about the eighteenth day of May; and, further, that the written agreement provided that time was of the essence of the contract.

Appel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burns v. SewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Kessler v. PruittIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hayne v. FentonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Carver v. VanArsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Kennedy v. DennstadtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Langston v. HuffackerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Dullanty v. Comstock Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Miller v. Marysville Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lowrey v. Allstate Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API