Legal Opinion

Schavey v. Roylston

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 17, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 645PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners have requested this court, via these mandamus proceedings, to direct the respondent judge, sitting as a committing magistrate, to exercise his discretion to exclude spectators from the courtroom during a preliminary hearing being conducted to determine whether the petitioners should be held to answer certain criminal charges. The charges stem from alleged conduct of the petitioners involving a 16-year-old female, previously adjudicated a delinquent child. Her testimony is part of the State’s case.

The sole question is whether the modification of Rule 27, 1 Rules of Criminal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Philip Orlando, Relator-Appellant v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kirstowsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated v. JenningsArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Goldberg v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dickinson Newspapers, Inc. v. JorgensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Arpaio v. BacaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API