Legal Opinion
Patterson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 2012No. Nos. 08-CF-876, 10-CO-1611PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en bane, the amicus curiae’s memorandum in support of appellant’s petition, and the appellee’s response thereto, it is
ORDERED by the merits division * that the appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted and the opinion of the court of February 16, 2012, 37 A.3d 230 (D.C.2012), is amended as follows:
The last sentence of the first paragraph of the majority opinion is amended to say: “We conclude that appellant’s claims do not entitle him to relief, and, accordingly, we affirm his convictions.” It is
FURTHER ORDERED that…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dyas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
4Cited by5 opinions
- Jeremiah Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brian Lamont Copeland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jeremiah Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013