Lamont v. Williams
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Pratt District Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff Williams, at the January term, 1888. Defendant Lamont brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
This action was commenced by Geo. A. Williams in the district court of Pratt county on the 19th day of November, 1887, against the sheriff of Pratt county, to recover possession of a general stock of merchandise in the town of Preston, in said county, that was in the custody of the sheriff by reason of attachment proceedings against one Matthew Williams, at the suit of several wholesale merchants. Geo. A. Williams is the son of Matthew Williams, and claims to be a purchaser for value of the stock of merchandise attached. There was a trial by a jury and a verdict and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Gray v. UlrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Batchelor v. WalburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Hoisington v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Lewis v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ft. Smith & W. R. v. State Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Deschenes v. Beall, Beall ReevesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Upton v. PendrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921