Legal Opinion
Triangle Cement Corp. v. Towboats Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 5, 1967No. 63 Ad. 1108PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BONSAL, District Judge.
In this admiralty action tried before the Court on May 24, 1967, plaintiffs Triangle Cement Corp. (Triangle) and *74Hughes Bulk, Inc. (Hughes), seek to recover for damages to the barge N. L. WALLACE (the WALLACE) sustained as the result of a collision between the WALLACE and the towboat CINCINNATI (the CINCINNATI) while the WALLACE was being towed by the towboat TURECAMO BOYS (the TURECAMO) on the East River, Manhattan, New York, on April 12, 1963. The following constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rule…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Boston Metals Co. v. the Winding GulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- The Buenos AiresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Complaint of B.F.T. No. Two Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Interstate Towing Co. v. StissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Insurance Co. of North America v. John J. Bordlee Contractors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982
- Interstate Towing Co. v. StissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Champion International Corp. v. S.S. Lash PacificoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.