Legal Opinion

Pool v. Lohman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1996No. 20803PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff sought “trial de novo” following the suspension of his privileges to operate a motor vehicle. The petition alleged that Plaintiff was arrested on March 4, 1995, for driving while intoxicated; that his driving privileges were suspended as a result of the arrest; which suspension was sustained following an administrative hearing. Defendant-Appellant admitted these allegations.

Following non-jury trial, the trial court ordered that Plaintiffs driving privileges be reinstated. Defendant appeals presenting one point relied on.1

Review is under Rule 73.01. “As that rule is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Sellenriek v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Reinert v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Fitzgerald v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furne v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Chrin v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Kinzenbaw v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Kinzenbaw v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API