Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kinzenbaw v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 2001No. SC 83802Published

1Concurrence

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.,

Chief Justice, concurring.

I agree that the case should be reversed and remanded for a new hearing, but I write separately to express my partial disagreement with the majority’s rationale. My concern is that the majority has misallocated to the Director of Revenue the “burden of producing evidence” that Kinzenbaw is not qualified for a driver’s license and improperly requires the Director to introduce the administrative record to meet that burden. In my view, this case should be resolved simply by holding that the only party with any burden of proof, whether couched as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frank v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Wehrkamp v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Wampler v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Stroup v. LeipardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Hautly Cheese Co. v. Wine Brokers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API