Espinoza v. State

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Mario Espinoza was convicted of two counts of delivering a controlled substance. He appeals the judgment and sentence, raising issues of prosecutorial misconduct, improper admission of an inculpatory statement, improper admission of prior bad acts evidence, and error in the jury selection process. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

ISSUES

Espinoza presented eleven issues for our review, which we decline to list here. The State succinctly summarizes the issues as:

I. Did the district court properly resolve all matters relating to the admission of appellant’s…