Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Lingeman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1901No. 3,355PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Ero-m the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Appellee filed a claim against the estate of appellant's decedent for damages for the breach of a contract for the exchange of lands. Appellant answered in denial. Trial by jury, verdict in appellee's favor, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered on the verdict for $19,304.10. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the complaint or claim, and the denial of a new trial. Each of the four paragraphs of appellee's claim is based.upon the following contracts: “In this contract, E. H. Shirk is to deed John Lingeman, or order, 2,560 acres of land in Craighead county,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Coles v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Board of Commissioners v. MutchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brunson v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCoy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Halstead v. SiglerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. v. Burns Bottling MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Horner v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API