Snively v. Meixsell
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Saline County; the Hon. Prince A. Pearce, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington
Appellee insists that judgment should be affirmed for failure by appellant to state in the abstract that exception ivas taken to overruling motion for new trial and to rendition of judgment; also for failure to recite in full the instructions given and refused; and cites in support, Ettlinger Printing Co. v. Copelin, 76 Ill. App. 520; Dickinson v. Gray, 72 Ill. App. 55; Gibler v. City of Mattoon, 167 Ill. 18; Fireman’s Ins. Co. v. Peck, 126 Ill. 494.
We have no disposition to relax the rule as held in these cases, but as appellant has confessed the omissions by filing an additional abstract…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gibler v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Safford v. GroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Tate v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Commercial Trust Co. of Hagerstown v. BurchDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1920
- Custer v. HarmonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Smith v. HoffmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905