Legal Opinion

Lilygren v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 1969No. 32-40215-1, 32-40482-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

The appellants Rogers, contract purchasers of land, defended a lawsuit to recover delinquent pay ments brought by the sellers Lilygren, claiming they were fraudulently induced to buy certain erosion plagued ocean front property located in Pacific County, Washington. They also attacked the adequacy of the legal description, contending the contract violated the statute of frauds. Judgment was entered in the Superior Court for King County upholding the contract and dismissing the defense of fraud in the inducement. The purchasers appealed.

Thereafter, the sellers started another action in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Kean v. Calumet Canal & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Little v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Key Design, Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Meder v. CCME CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API