Morledge v. Redington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
On the petition of Bircham F. Morledge for a writ of mandamus directed to George T. Redington as clerk of the city of St. Paul, commanding him to modify the official ballot in specified particulars, the supreme court ordered the latter and certain interested candidates to show cause why the writ should not issue.
1Per curiam
The respondent herein, the city clerk of the city of St. Paul, received in due time a petition, regular in form, and signed and verified by the required number of qualified electors of the city, which purported to nominate ITans Carstensen as a candidate for mayor of the city, and Matthew J. Cikanek as a candidate for assemblyman of the city, under the party name and designation of “Socialist Labor,” to be voted for at the next general city election. The clerk also received three other petitions, regular in form, and signed and verified by the required number of electors of the city, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davidson v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Mead v. MeadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Brown v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gingles v. Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914