Legal Opinion
Mead v. Mead
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1902No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Calhoun; Winsor, J. Bill by Sarah A. Mead against Carey A. Mead for a divorce. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
We are of the opinion that the decree of the learned circuit judge, dismissing the complainant’s bill, was justified by the testimony, and should not be dis-' turbed. As the case involves no disputed question of law, it is unnecessary to say more.
The decree is affirmed.
Moore, Grant, and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Cooke v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Riter v. DouglassNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Winget v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Hoskins v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- State ex rel. Mills v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.