Arredondo v. State

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Felipe Arredondo appeals from a default judgment rendered in favor of the State in a forfeiture proceeding.

Arredondo claims that the trial court erred in rendering a default judgment against him (1) because it does not appear on the face of the record that he was served with a certified copy of the notice of seizure and intended forfeiture as required by statute, (2) because the citation served on Arredondo fails to give adequate notice, and (3) because the findings contained in the decree of forfeiture are not supported by the original notice of forfeiture.

On October 2,…