Legal Opinion

Scott, Admr. v. Marshall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1951No. 200PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This law appeal is from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury for the plaintiff in a wrongful death action, wherein plaintiff’s decedent, a little girl nine years of age, rode her bicycle out of the driveway of her home onto State Route 131 in Clermont County, directly in the path of an automobile being driven by defendant, and in the ensuing collision received the injuries resulting in her death a matter of hours thereafter.

One of the errors assigned is that the court charged on the assured clear distance, when it is claimed the evidence clearly excluded application of that rule…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  3. Brennan v. MayoMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. Mark C. Walker & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Troutman v. Mutual Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drayton Ex Rel. Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1975
  2. Kurz v. Great Parks of Hamilton Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Mapes v. OpperOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Garver v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API