Legal Opinion

Arnold Barber & Beauty Supply Co. v. Provance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1952No. 4-9951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit by tbe appellant to recover a balance of $526.79 owed to it under a title retaining contract by which it had sold certain beauty shop equipment to Opal Parker. Upon the filing of the complaint the plaintiff obtained a writ of attachment and had the sheriff take possession of the above equipment. The appellee, Virginia Provance, by intervention asserted that several months before the suit was brought she had formed a partnership with Opal Parker and had bought a half interest in the fixtures that were later attached. The intervener, alleging that the partnership property was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lenox v. PikeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1839
  2. Provance v. Arnold Barber & Beauty Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Boatwright v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  4. Denton v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. D.C. Goff Co. v. First St. Bk. of DequeenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Mowery v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. In Re GillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990
  4. Bushmiaer v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  5. Jones v. Ipawn Rodney Parham, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API