Legal Opinion
Dominguez v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 14, 1975No. M-75-61PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRETT, Presiding Judge:
Appellant, Karen Lanette Dominguez, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, for the offense of Outraging Public Decency. Her punishment was fixed at a fine in the amount of Three Hundred ($300) Dollars and ten (10) days’ imprisonment in the city jail. From said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.
In light of the decision that this case must be reversed and remanded for a new trial, this Court deems it unnecessary to recite the facts of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kois v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rachel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Haines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Profit v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- State v. WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Curtis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Curtis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.