Legal Opinion

Grooms v. Brown-Marx Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 25, 1938No. 6 Div. 412PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question presented by the appeal, under § 6081 of the Code, is the discharge of the injunction for lack of a proper bond. ,

The assignment of error that will be considered and determine the question is: “The Court erred in making an order requiring the complainant to file another and additional bond under pain of having the writ of injunction discharged in the absence of a motion to dissolve the injunction and a full hearing thereon.”

A motion to dissolve an injunction and action thereon touches the equity of the bill, while one to discharge presents the question of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loop National Bank of Mobile v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Patton v. RobisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Taylor v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Riley v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API