Legal Opinion

Whitman v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 10, 2014No. 14-29Relating-toCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Statement of Justice SCALIA, with whom Justice THOMASjoins, respecting the denial of certiorari.

A court owes no deference to the prosecution's interpretation of a criminal law. Criminal statutes "are for the courts, not for the Government, to construe."

*353 Abramski v. United States, 573 U.S. ----, ----, 134 S.Ct. 2259 , 2274, 189 L.Ed.2d 262 (2014). This case, a criminal prosecution under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 491 , as amended, 15 U.S.C. 78j(b), raises a related question: Does a court owe deference to an executive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  4. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Cargill v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. Juan Esquivel-Quintana v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Procopio v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API