Legal Opinion

Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 31, 2003No. CIV.A. 00-1246(RWR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERTS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of a United States Postal Service (“USPS”) regulation that prohibits people from soliciting signatures for petitions, polls or surveys on exterior USPS property. The parties’ initial cross-motions for summary judgment were denied because there were insufficient facts in the record to entitle either party to judgment as a matter of law. Following discovery, the parties renewed their cross-motions for summary judgment. Because the record now establishes that this content-neutral regulation promotes a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Del Gallo v. ParentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API