Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of a United States Postal Service (“USPS”) regulation that prohibits people from soliciting signatures for petitions, polls or surveys on exterior USPS property. The parties’ initial cross-motions for summary judgment were denied because there were insufficient facts in the record to entitle either party to judgment as a matter of law. Following discovery, the parties renewed their cross-motions for summary judgment. Because the record now establishes that this content-neutral regulation promotes a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Del Gallo v. ParentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.