Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Swan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1968No. Docket 1,448PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

This is a rear-end collision case. Plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiff Irving Tasco, the driver of the automobile in which both plaintiffs were riding, claims he was entitled to a directed verdict. Tasco’s passenger, Bernard Humphrey, asserts that the trial judge directed a verdict in his favor, but that the jury failed to follow that instruction. Both plaintiffs claim the judge erred in not granting their motion for a new trial.

Tasco was driving east in the right-hand lane on Larned in downtown Detroit, Michigan. He stopped for a red traffic signal at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Murchie v. Standard Oil CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Fordon v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Mosley v. DatiMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. McCalebMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Armstrong v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Williams v. FiedlarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API