Legal Opinion

Skrapka v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 2008No. 105,413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.

1 1 The issue presented is whether an aunt and uncle have any right whatsoever to participate in a review proceeding for placement of nieces and a nephew when they have never had custody of the children, have never acted in loco parentis, and are not persons guaranteed to be allowed to intervene pursuant to 10 O.S. Supp.2002 § 7008-7.1(C). 1 Under the facts of this cause, a proper determination of the children's best interests requires that the aunt and uncle be allowed to participate in the review proceedings. Original jurisdiction is assumed and the Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. ColclazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Bolling v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. In Re Sanders' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. In the Matter of the Guardianship of M.R.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. In Re BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. In the Matter of BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Redcorn v. KnoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API