Southgate v. Continental Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action for the construction of a will and codicils.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
Charles L. E. Hutchinson died on September 28, 1890, leaving a will and two codicils which have been duly admitted to probate. Administrators with the will annexed were appointed, who so far administered his estate as to pay all his debts, and dispose of all his estate except a certain contract or claim against parties residing in France, for the sum of six hundred and twenty-nine thousand two hundred francs. Thereupon an order was made by the surrogate upon consent of all parties in interest, directing said administrators to assign such contract or claim to the defendant the Continental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of StanfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- State of Connecticut v.JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Dewitt v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Wainwright v. TuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- In re the Estate of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Construction of the Will of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of KelloggNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of KarstensNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of BridgmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.