Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 2, 1931No. 5015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The question involved in this ease relates to a ruling of the municipal court in a garnishment case.

On December 1, 1927, the plaintiff in error recovered a judgment against Marland W. Townsend by consideration of the municipal ■court in the sum of $250, and an attachment was issued thereon with a writ of garnishment to the Potomac Electric Power Company.

The following is a copy of one of the interrogatories served upon the garnishee: “Were you at the time of the service of the annexed writ of attachment, or have you been between the time of such service and the filing of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fidelity Savings Co. v. Security Savings & Commercial BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Western Urn Manufacturing Company v. American Pipe and Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Ourisman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Pohanka Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Seaboard Finance Co. v. RuppertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API