Western Urn Manufacturing Company v. American Pipe and Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
When an earlier phase of this litigation was before us, we pointed out that the District Court had misconceived the theory upon which its jurisdiction had been invoked. We remanded, noting that if the named garnishee Greene “shall be found to have been possessed of assets, funds or credits, of the appellee at the time the writ was served,” the court should reinstate the complaint “subject to such further proceedings as the parties may feel advised to pursue.” At a hearing after remand, the trial judge denied appellants’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint. It…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Houston v. OrmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Mary Osin v. Robert H. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Anglo-American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington HeightsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Pesta v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988