Legal Opinion

Keeton v. City of Gatlinburg

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 11, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ petition to rezone their tract of land lying along Church Street, within the City of Gatlinburg, from R-l, low density residential, to R-2, high density residential, was denied by the city but, in a declaratory action in chancery court, the chancellor entered judgment declaring “the classification by the defendants ... is arbitrary, unreasonable, and without a rational basis and accordingly is ordered reclassified as R-2, high density residential.”

The dispute is before us on appeal by the City of Gatlinburg.

The basis of the court’s ruling appears in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barret v. County of ShelbyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCallen v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wadlyn Corp. v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. Charles Dallas Cauthern v. City of White Bluff, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. Grady Cunningham v. Bedford County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. LOVEDAY SPRINGS v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEECourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API