Shoemaker v. McMonigle
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Harrison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Franklin, C.
Appellant sued appellee for the possession of a certain tract of land. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first is in the usual form, containing a defective description of the land. The second is in the same form, containing a sufficient description of the land by metes and bounds. The defendant answered by a general denial. There was a trial by jury, and, under an instruction by the court to return a verdict for the defendant, a verdict was returned accordingly; and, over a motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered for the defendant for costs.
The error assigned in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Langohr v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Buchanan v. WhithamIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Major v. BrushIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Second National Bank v. CoreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Armstrong v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Edens v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.