Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Peeler

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 27, 1984No. Bankruptcy 383-01974PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue is whether the debtor’s Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) is an ex-emptable annuity under T.C.A. § 26-2-111. After consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties and applicable authority, the court finds that this IRA is not an exemptable annuity under Tennessee law and the trustee’s objection to the claimed exemption should be SUSTAINED.

The following constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 7052 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

Hubert G. Peeler (“debtor”) filed a voluntary Chapter 7 petition on July 29,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. J. Kenneth Rhodes, Debtor v. Larry Stewart, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re HowertonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  3. In Re TalbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981
  4. In Re WernerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  5. In Re ClarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re IaconoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  2. In Re HerbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re InnisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API