Legal Opinion

Galliher v. Stewart

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 28, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These two actions of tort, tried together, are to recover for the death of the plaintiff Galliher’s intestate and for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff Bartley when an automobile, driven by one Conley, in which they were riding, was in collision with an automobile operated by the defendant. The collision occurred about a quarter past twelve on a December morning on a two-lane Concrete road. It was snowing and visibility was poor. There was a curve in the highway, on the inner side of which was a guard rail with a sharp, deep drop “directly from” it. The jury could ’have found that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Linnehan v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Engel v. Boston Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Dixon v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Turner v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. GeislerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. FerreiraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Frontiero v. BrownMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API