Legal Opinion

Williams v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1906No. Calendar No. 21,777PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Mandamus by Stephen D. Williams to compel George A. Prescott, secretary of State, to give the notices of election of State senators under the provisions of Act No. 264, Pub. Acts 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Relator, a resident and elector in Wayne county, applies for a writ of mandamus against respondent, secretary of State, to compel him to give notice of the election of senators required by section 3606, 1 Comp. Laws, under Act No. 264, Pub. Acts 1895, claiming that Act No. 245 of the Public Acts of 1905, entitled “An act to divide the State of Michigan into thirty-two senatorial districts,” being the act under which respondent proposes to give said notices, and also Act No. 189 of the Public Acts of 1901, are unconstitutional and void; that the limitation upon the power delegated by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Giddings v. BlackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jones v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Attorney General v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Scholle v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Scholle v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API