Legal Opinion

Curry v. Weiford

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided September 21, 2005No. CIV.A. 2:03CV115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MAXWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On December 22, 2003, the plaintiff filed a pro se civil action against the above-named defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, 18 U.S.C. § 241, and W.Va.Code §§ 61-2-9, 61-5-27, and 61-5-28 seeking monetary damages and a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from continuing to violate her civil and constitutional rights.

On June 13, 2005, the defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court issued a notice…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lola Ziadie v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  2. Philip P. Rockwell v. Frederick County VA Sheriff's Office et al.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API