Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Williamsburg
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 9, 2019No. CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02002-HLTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLY L. TEETER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Eric Clark brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant City of Williamsburg, Kansas ("City") violated his constitutional rights under the First and Fourth Amendments.1 He also brings an inverse condemnation action under Kansas state law. Doc. 55 at 14. This case stems from a violation notice the City sent Clark regarding signs at the edge of Clark's property. Both parties have filed summary-judgment motions as to all claims. Doc. 78; Doc. 91.
As to Clark's First Amendment claim, the Court finds that Article 8, § 4.A.(6) is…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guzman Loera v. TrueDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023